Is ear cropping animal cruelty? Animal welfare is a hot topic these days.
With laws changing to prevent animal cruelty and new information coming quickly, it can be hard to form our own opinions on the matter.
One controversial practice is ear cropping in animals, which raises the question: Is ear cropping animal cruelty?
Ear cropping is a surgical procedure where parts of the animal’s ears are removed or reshaped.
The practice has been around for centuries, but it recently came back into focus as people start taking a closer look at how we treat animals.
Although ear cropping has been defended as necessary for medical purposes, many organizations speak out against it, arguing that it constitutes animal cruelty.
It is important to understand how ear cropping affects animals and whether such practices should be allowed.
So to answer this question, let us take a closer look at what ear cropping really entails and why organizations are opposed to it.
Ear cropping is a controversial practice that occurs when part of an animal’s ears are surgically removed.
It typically happens in breeds such as Pitbulls and Dobermans, but can be done to any dog or cat.
Some people argue that while it can be seen as cruel and unnecessary, ear cropping has been used for centuries and still plays an important role in some dog breeds today.
In this article, we’ll look at both sides of the debate on whether ear cropping should be continued or stopped in order to determine if it’s really animal cruelty.
Credit: https://unsplash.com/@roller1
Table of Contents
Is Ear Cropping Animal Cruelty?
Ear cropping is a cosmetic procedure where a veterinarian surgically removes a portion of the animal’s ears.
This is done mostly with dogs, although occasionally cats may also get their ears cropped depending on the breed.
The goal of the procedure is to make ears shorterif desired by the owner; however, it’s mainly used as an aesthetic preference for certain breeds such as Doberman Pinschers and Pitbulls.
The surgery isn’t necessary for medical reasons unless there’s something wrong with the pet’s ear that needs special attention from a veterinarian.
The Pro Argument: Ear Cropping Is Not Animal Cruelty
Supporters of ear-cropping argue that it’s not animal cruelty because it does not cause physical pain or suffering to pets.
They also claim that since ear cropping has been done for centuries, it’s part of some dog/cat breed norms so removing these makes them feel incomplete or causes psychological distress instead of physical harm.
Some also point out that many pet owners choose ear-cropped animals over regular pet models; thus, they believe removing these makes such pups/kittens feel more attractive and unique which increases their chance at being adopted faster than others without cropped ears.
Ultimately supporting this argument are those who stand behind the notion of “celebrating difference.”
The Con Argument: Ear Cropping Is Animal Cruelty
On contrary to the pro argument above, opponents regard ear cropping as animal cruelty because they believe it does indeed cause physical pain/suffering due to its invasive nature as surgical procedure—especially if not done correctly with proper protocols/precautions taken beforehand (such as sterilization).
They compare this process to other invasive practices like docking tails which usually have no real benefit except maybe aesthetics (in very few cases).
Also taking into consideration is the aftercare needed for those pets when recovering from surgery including care related costs associated with healing time (pain killers, bandages etc.).
Lastly striking against this argument is the fact many people view dogs & cats alike as real members of family too which means should not subject them any unnecessary treatments (no matter how slight) just based off someone else personal aesthetic preference/taste!
Conclusion
Overall whether or not you view ear cropping as animal cruelty depends upon your own personal beliefs on how animals should be treated around us humans—including what forms of procedures deserve respect versus ones considered unjustified by society standards today.
But one thing remains clear – hearing opposing arguments will help relate both sides together which might potentially lead towards a compromise between those debating over issue concerning animal welfare (earcrops included) down line!
Leave a Reply